Why your agency website is not generating any inquiries
Have the article read aloud.
Clean markup, fast loading times, responsive design. Still no requests? The problem lies elsewhere.
Most TYPO3 agency websites look technically solid. Clean markup, fast loading times, responsive design. Nevertheless, surprisingly little happens on many of these sites. No inquiries. No contact form entries. No phone that rings.
The problem is rarely due to technology. It's down to psychology.
I have been working intensively on conversion psychology for some time now and have come across a model that has opened my eyes. The 7-stage model by market and advertising psychologist Sebastian Fröder describes seven psychological hurdles that a landing page has to overcome before a visitor is ready to take action. If a single stage is skipped or poorly implemented, the entire process collapses.
I have transferred the model to our industry. Specifically: to your own agency or freelancer website. In other words, the site you want to use to attract customers yourself. Much of this can of course also be applied to client projects, but the focus of this article is on your own online presence. And I've noticed that: Most people don't fail at one stage, but at several at the same time.
Stage 1: Attention. Or: Why your visitor leaves immediately
The brain decides within milliseconds whether something is relevant. The first visual impression, the headline, the image in the hero section: all of these must create a stopping effect. If the visitor doesn't immediately think "Wait, this could be interesting", they'll leave. On to the next search result.
With many TYPO3 agency websites, this first impression looks like this: A generic stock photo of smiling people in a meeting room. Below that, a headline like "Welcome to [agency name]" or "We make websites". Perhaps a slider with three interchangeable messages.
That doesn't create a stopping effect. It creates indifference.
The hero section must immediately make it clear what it's all about and why the visitor is in the right place. No welcome greeting. Not a generic promise. But a concrete statement that picks up the visitor in their situation.
Instead of "Welcome to web design agency XY", say: "You need someone who doesn't just implement your TYPO3 project, but thinks along with you. Someone who won't leave you alone after the launch." That's personal. It addresses a real fear. That sticks with you.
Level 2: Relevance. Am I even in the right place?
After the attention comes the relevance check. The brain compares at lightning speed: Does this have anything to do with my situation? Does the page describe my problem? Does it address my goal?
If the answer is "no" or even just "maybe", the visitor is gone. Just like in step 1.
This is the point at which many sites fail because they communicate too broadly. "We offer web design, SEO, social media, e-commerce and consulting" sounds like a broad portfolio at first glance. At second glance, no one feels specifically addressed.
Three checkpoints that a page must pass:
- Does it describe MY situation?
- Does it address MY problem?
- Does the offer fit MY goal?
Anyone who implements TYPO3 projects for medium-sized companies should communicate exactly that. Not "We do everything for everyone", but "We build TYPO3 websites for SMEs that need a professional online presence but don't have the time or inclination to deal with the technology behind it." The right visitor thinks: "That's exactly my situation." And stays.
Step 3: Clarity. If the visitor doesn't understand what you're offering
Even if attention and relevance are right: If the visitor does not understand what you are offering within seconds, they will leave. The concept behind this is called cognitive ease. The easier it is for the brain to process information, the more likely something is to be perceived as trustworthy and true. High cognitive load creates mistrust.
This is not a question of style. It is psychology.
Daniel Kahneman described in his standard work "Thinking, Fast and Slow" that the fast, intuitive thinking system (System 1) prefers information that is easy to process. Complex sentences, technical terms without explanation, convoluted structures: all of these activate the slow, analytical System 2. And System 2 is exhausting. The brain avoids effort if there is an alternative. The alternative is to close the page.
Especially in the TYPO3 world, we tend to throw around technical jargon. "Headless CMS architecture with an API-first approach" may work in a technical lecture. On a landing page that is supposed to convince potential customers, it's poison. Because the decision-maker who commissions the agency is rarely the developer. It is the managing director, the marketing manager, the IT manager. They need clear language. Short sentences. Concrete results instead of buzzwords.
Simple language is not a sign of simplicity. It is a sign of clarity.
Level 4: Trust. The level that almost everyone only half understands
Trust has two dimensions. Everyone knows the first: "Are they credible?" External validation through logos, customer testimonials, reference projects, partnerships. That's what most agencies do. Logo strips with client brands, a few quotes, maybe a case study.
The second dimension is almost always overlooked: "Can I believe this for myself?" Can the visitor be confident that the solution will also work for them? That his project is not too small, too special or too complicated?
This is a point that I see again and again in practice. A potential customer looks at an agency's references. There are big names there: BMW, Telekom, Stadtwerke München. The client thinks: "They can certainly do that. But we are a medium-sized company with 50 employees. Isn't that a bit too big for us? Will they even bother with our small project?"
That is self-trust. And it's completely missing on most sites.
How do you build self-trust? Through success stories from customers who are similar to the visitor. Through comprehensible process descriptions that show: "This is how a project works for us, step by step." Through testimonials that don't just say "They're good", but describe a transformation.
An example: "Before, we had chaos in the editorial department, now our 12 editors work smoothly in the system." That is concrete. It is comprehensible. And it shows the visitor: someone was in a similar situation to me and it worked.
Or another scenario: a craft business with 30 employees only sees references from corporations and municipal utilities on the agency website. The first reaction: "They must be too expensive for us." But then he finds a case study of a similarly sized business. With concrete figures: Project duration, scope, result. Suddenly he no longer thinks "Too big for us", but "That's exactly what we need."
Logos show competence. But only stories like this show the visitor: This can also work for me.
Stage 5: Desire. Why features are useless too early
Only after attention, relevance, clarity and trust does real desire arise. Genuine motivation to buy. This is the point at which many funnels fail because they try to create desire far too early.
I see this on many agency websites: The hero section immediately lists features. "Web development. Fast loading times. Search engine optimization. Personal contact person." These are facts. But facts alone do not create desire.
Neuroscience confirms this: without an emotional impulse, no decision can be made. Antonio Damasio has shown that people with damage in the emotional area of the brain are no longer able to make sensible decisions despite their logic being intact. The facts were there. But without emotion, nothing happened.
Applied to a landing page, this means: first establish the problem and identification. Then awaken the desire for the solution. Address the basic psychological motives: security ("No nasty surprises after the launch"), control ("You always have an overview of your project"), status ("A website that impresses your customers, not just works").
Features come afterwards. As confirmation of an emotion that has already been aroused.
Stage 6: Logical justification. Only now come the facts
After the desire has been built up emotionally, logic comes into play. The visitor asks: Is it worth the price? Does it make sense? How high is the risk?
Sebastian Fröder emphasizes: "If you introduce logic too early, you will fail. Logic justifies an emotional decision that has already been made. It does not replace it.
This confirms what Daniel Kahneman described as Dual Process Theory: System 1 (fast, emotional, intuitive) makes the decision. System 2 (slow, analytical, rational) subsequently provides the justification. The customer makes an emotional decision in favor of the agency and then looks for rational reasons to justify this decision.
For the page structure, this means that features, packages, prices and technical details belong at the bottom of the page. Not in the hero section. Not as the first thing. But as a rational back-up for an emotional decision that has already been made further up the page.
Specifically: This is where the hard numbers belong. Project duration: 8 weeks from kickoff to launch. Response time for support requests: less than 24 hours. Three clearly defined packages with a transparent price structure. These facts are effective because the visitor has already made an emotional decision at this point. He is now only looking for rational reasons to justify this decision to himself (and to the boss).
Many TYPO3 agency websites do exactly the opposite. They start with a feature list and hope that the logic alone will be convincing. This rarely works.
Stage 7: Readiness to act. The last hurdle before conversion
The visitor is faced with a decision. Attention, relevance, clarity, trust, desire and logical justification: Everything fits. And then... a contact form with 15 fields. Mandatory field Company name. Mandatory field Phone number. Mandatory field "How did you hear about us?"
Every unnecessary form field is a barrier to conversion. Every additional click increases the likelihood that the visitor will abandon the form.
The checkout process (for an agency: the contact process) must be simple and secure. Name, email, short message. That's it. Everything else can be clarified in the initial consultation.
And the call-to-action itself? "Contact us" is the equivalent of "Click here". Meaningless. Better: state the specific next step and focus on the benefits. Instead of "Contact us", say "Yes, I would like a non-binding project meeting" or "Discuss my TYPO3 project". The visitor clicks on a result, not on an action.
The basic problem: We think in terms of features instead of feelings
When I look at the typical TYPO3 agency website, I always see the same pattern: "We can do this. We do this. We offer this and that." Competence is demonstrated. Features are listed. Technical excellence is emphasized.
But the question that really concerns the visitor is rarely answered: What's in it for me? What will change for me? What problem will be solved?
The 7-step model shows that emotion comes before reason. Always. Not because rational arguments are unimportant, but because they only work when the emotional impulse is already there.
My own experience confirms this. Over the last few years, I have been working intensively on positioning, target group psychology and conversion optimization. Not because I wanted to become a marketing expert, but because I realized: Technology alone is not enough. A website can be technically perfect and still not generate any inquiries if the psychological basis is missing.
Since I have consistently made sure that visitors to my own pages know immediately whether they are in the right place, a lot has happened. I regularly receive inquiries, even for collaborations. My products are being bought, even without active promotion. The TYPO3 13 video training has been selling steadily for months without me advertising it.
Is that all perfect? Certainly not. I am constantly optimizing, testing new formulations, revising page structures. When I look at my own pages from three or four years ago, I can immediately see what I would do differently today. But that's exactly the point: it's a process. And the difference between then and now is noticeable. Not because I know a magic trick, but because the site does the convincing. Step by step.
What you can do now
The 7-step model is not a theoretical construct. It's a practical checklist that you can check any landing page against. Take your own website and go through the seven steps:
- Attention: does your hero section create a stopping effect? Or does it look like any other agency website?
- Relevance: Does your ideal customer recognize themselves in the first few seconds? Or are you communicating too broadly?
- Clarity: Does a non-technical person immediately understand what you offer? Or are you hiding behind technical terms? (Simple test: Show your homepage to someone who doesn't come from IT and ask them what you offer. If they can't say it in one sentence, you have a clarity problem).
- Trust: Are you just showing logos? Or also stories that show the visitor: "This can also work for me"?
- Desire: Are you appealing to emotions? Or are you just listing features?
- Logical justification: Do the facts come at the right time? Or are you forcing them on the visitor before they are emotionally engaged?
- Willingness to act: Is your contact process simple? Or are you creating unnecessary hurdles?
The honest answer to these questions will show you where your site is losing visitors. And that's exactly where the leverage lies.
Because most TYPO3 agency websites don't fail because of the technology. They fail because of psychology. And the good thing is: psychology can be learned. Just like TYPO3.
But before you start optimizing individual steps, clarify the basis: Who do you want to reach? What really drives these people? How do you position yourself so that the right people end up with you? If you want to delve deeper into this, take a look at my brand compass workshop. In one day, you will work out your positioning, understand your target group and build a system that will help you with every landing page and every text.
Sources and scientific background
- Sebastian Fröder: Market and advertising psychologist, over 15 years of experience, more than 500 companies supported. The 7-stage model comes from his video "Conversion Psychology: The 7 Stages of a Functioning Funnel".
- Daniel Kahneman: "Thinking, Fast and Slow" (2011). Dual Process Theory, System 1 and System 2, Cognitive Ease. Farnam Street: Daniel Kahneman, The Decision Lab: System 1 and System 2.
- Antonio Damasio: Somatic Marker Hypothesis. "Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain" (1994). Wikipedia: Somatic Marker Hypothesis, The Decision Lab: Somatic Marker Hypothesis.
Most websites don't fail because of technology, but because of psychology. The 7-stage model of conversion psychology shows: If a single psychological hurdle (attention, relevance, clarity, trust, desire, logical justification or willingness to act) is not overcome, the entire conversion process collapses.
The most common mistake is to present features and technical services too early, before the visitor has been emotionally picked up. Studies on Dual Process Theory (Kahneman) show: Purchase decisions are made emotionally and only then justified rationally. If you start with a feature list, you skip the emotional activation.
Self-trust is the second level of trust: The visitor must not only believe that the provider is competent, but also that the solution works for their own situation. Logos and references show competence, but only success stories from similar customers show the visitor: "This can also work for me."
The hero section must immediately create a stop effect and make it clear to the visitor whether they are in the right place. Instead of generic welcome greetings or stock photos, there should be a concrete, specific statement that describes the situation of the desired customer and creates relevance.
As few as possible. Each additional mandatory field increases the likelihood of an abort. Name, e-mail and a short message are sufficient for the initial contact. All other information can be clarified in the initial meeting.
Do you have a question or want to discuss the topic?
In the Community Hub for TYPO3 you can exchange ideas with other TYPO3 users. And if you don't want to miss any new articles: The TYPO3 Newsletter comes once a month, without spam.
Hi, I'm Wolfgang.
I have been working with TYPO3 since 2006. Not in theory, but in real projects with real deadlines. I've probably had the problems you're having three times already.
At some point, I started putting my knowledge into video courses. Not because I like being in front of the camera, but because I kept hearing the same questions over and over again. There are now hundreds of videos. Every single one was the result of a specific question from a specific project.
What makes me different from a YouTube tutorial: I not only know the solution, but also the context. Why something works. When it doesn't work. And which mistakes you can avoid because I've already made them.
My participants use me as a sparring partner. Not in the sense of "call me anytime", but like this: You come to the live session with a specific problem, post your question in the community or watch the appropriate video. And get an answer that works because it comes from practical experience.
As a member of the TYPO3 Education & Certification Committee, I make sure that the certification exams are kept up to date. What is tested there flows directly into my courses.